What is Knowledge?
What is knowledge?
I’m sitting here on my living room couch and pondering on
how I would define knowledge in my own words without quoting, paraphrasing or
referencing another person's definition. As I continued to reflect, I suddenly realize
that I am tapping into my knowledge bank to use words to define my
understanding of knowledge. Alas! I have my own definition of what knowledge
is- “knowledge is progressive in nature and it is a deposit of information into
a person’s mind bank”. Knowledge can be
deliberate (I am studying a Master of Arts in Education because I want to be
more knowledgeable in the field of education) or experiential (I work in a
multi- racial organization and I’m knowledgeable about the lifestyles of
Africans, Americans and Asians).
According to Nomaka and Toyama, 2006, “knowledge is a
dynamic human process of justifying personal belief towards the truth”.
Gottschalk (2007) proposes that knowledge is stored in human minds not
computers. He succinctly defines knowledge as “what a knower knows; there is no
knowledge without someone knowing it”. I consider Gottschalk’s postulations
very apt in understanding the definition of knowledge.
How is knowledge
controlled?
Knowledge can be classified as having two types. Tacit
knowledge is knowledge that exists in the mind and cannot be articulated with
words and explicit knowledge is knowledge that can be articulated with words. (Nomaka
& Toyama, 2006. These two types of knowledge can be controlled in different
ways. The tacit knowledge is subjective; therefore its control lies in the
hands of the possessor. He can choose to
impact or withhold knowledge. For example- a craftsman can choose to teach his
apprentice all he knows about his craft or he may decide to just teach the
basics and keep the other part as trade secret. The explicit knowledge on the
other hand, is more objective. It can be controlled by obtaining facts and
figures on a subject, research, theoretical approach and study (Nomaka &
Toyama, 2006). The level of explicit knowledge a person can acquire is
controlled by his willingness to dig deeper and study more on the subject.
Knowledge control is determined by what type of knowledge it is and knowledge
is controlled by the educational sector of a country. The more attention the
government of a nation gives to the educational sector, the more powerful the
nation will be.
Finally, we cannot talk about knowledge control without
talking about the exposure of an individual since knowledge dwells in the minds
of humans. The more versatile an individual is the more control he has over the
knowledge he receives.
How is knowledge
communicated?
The power of knowledge lies in its capacity to be shared
with more than one person (Abhary, Adriansen, Begovac, Djukic, Spuzic, Wood and
Xing, 2009). Knowledge can be communicated through formal and informal media.
Schools represent the formal medium of communicating knowledge. The teaching
faculty of every school is the major tool of communicating knowledge, without
teachers the whole world will be a cocoon of ignorance. Informal ways of
communicating knowledge are through, observation, self-experiences and shared
experiences of others, social media and family.
Opening up more platforms for cross disciplinary sharing of
knowledge through seminars, workshops and symposia can be avenues for knowledge
communication (D Wood et al, 2009). For example, doctors and other public
health physicians can organize workshops and seminars to educate the people on
how to prevent the spread of epidemics. Knowledge can also be communicated
through print and broadcast media.
Who decides what
good, bad and indifferent knowledge is?
Knowledge can be perceived to be good, bad, and indifferent
by an individual. What is good knowledge for me may be bad or indifferent
knowledge to another. A major determinant of how knowledge is rated is its
relevance. An easy example I can use to substantiate this point is what happens
in my home. My husband is very passionate about soccer, he is interested in any
information he can find on soccer. I am very indifferent about soccer, I don’t
enjoy watching it and any information about soccer will be seen as indifferent
knowledge to me.
There are certain factors that influence our perception of
knowledge. These are societal norms, religious beliefs, cultural values,
personal philosophies and personality traits. How we perceive knowledge is
largely dependent on these factors.
References:
Gottschalk, P. (2007) Knowledge
Management Systems: Value Shop Creation. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing
I Nonaka and Toyama. (2006). Creating Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Knowledge based
management. The Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy.
K Abhary, H K Adriansen, F Begovac, B Djukic, B Qin, S Spuzic, D Wood
and K Xing, (2009). World Conference on Educational Sciences. Some basic aspects of knowledge. Retrieved
from www.sciencedirect.com
Comments
Post a Comment